Editorial Policy | King of AEO

The King of AEO library aims to make complicated ideas understandable without removing the conditions that make an answer accurate.

Authorship and review

This initial library was drafted with AI assistance. The site distinguishes the publisher from a named expert reviewer and does not imply that a subject-matter review has occurred when it has not. Each article has been individually rewritten around a defined reader task, checked against primary sources and reviewed for overlap with neighbouring topics. This process is AI-assisted; it is not an independent expert certification.

Useful content

An article should answer a distinct reader question, explain important exceptions and offer a practical example. Length alone does not establish quality. The library uses article-specific explanations, worked examples and contextual links; originality and usefulness remain editorial responsibilities as the subject develops.

Evidence and examples

Product behaviour should be checked against current official documentation. Research claims should identify the original method and limits. Illustrative business examples are labelled and are not presented as real client results.

Dates and corrections

Publication dates describe the original release of a page. Modification dates describe substantive changes. Rebuilding the site does not automatically change those dates. Corrections should identify the claim affected and the information needed to revise it.

Commercial context

The project promotes the King of AEO brand and Vithurs. That relationship should remain clear. The library must not manufacture external recognition, testimonials, reviews or research results to support its positioning.

Reporting an issue

Use the contact page for available enquiry details. Include the article URL and the passage you believe needs correction.